Internet addresses for the networks people rely on

Through LARUS Limited, we provide IPv4 addresses to the network operators and businesses that keep people online. We have been a member of AFRINIC, the regional internet registry for Africa, since 2013.

We defend the rule of law, a democratic society, people’s freedom and the constitutional separation of powers. Those who have long controlled AFRINIC have violated every one of them, and we are fighting to correct it, in court and on the record.

Latest statement · Cloud Innovation Statement on AFRINIC Member Rights

Our position

AFRINIC’s Receiver is trying to remove us from a register of members the Supreme Court ordered us onto. On 11 June 2025, on AFRINIC’s own application, the Court directed that we be entered in that register. A Supreme Court rule of 9 October 2026 certifies that outcome, and the Registrar of Companies’ records show our name there from that day. On 31 October 2026 the Receiver announced that he had demanded our removal, copying the Prime Minister and other officials, without citing any court order for it. AFRINIC belongs to its members; our dispute is with those who have long controlled it and keep concentrating control in their own hands. We defend the rule of law, a democratic society, people’s freedom and the constitutional separation of powers: every Resource Member’s right to be recognised and protected by company law, elections held under AFRINIC’s own constitution, as the Court required in September 2023, and court decisions that no minister can set aside. We pursue this in court and publish the documents, including those that went against us.

On the record

Time and again the courts have protected our membership and held AFRINIC to its own constitution. Each decision links to the document.

See the full timeline
  1. Court stopped AFRINIC from terminating our membership

    After AFRINIC’s management went back on its undertaking to the Judge, the Supreme Court of Mauritius restrained AFRINIC, on our application, from terminating our resource membership until the dispute is finally determined.

    Recorded in 2022 SCJ 253, pages 1 and 10
  2. Court rejected the bid to shut us out of court

    The Supreme Court held that we could not be blamed for turning to an independent court to safeguard our rights, and set aside the objection that our application was an abuse of process. Both parties had accepted there was a serious matter to be tried.

    Read 2022 SCJ 253, pages 10 and 16–17
  3. On our application, AFRINIC was placed in receivership

    The Supreme Court of Mauritius found the orders we sought “fully justified, reasonable, and fair”, rejected AFRINIC’s preliminary objections as unsubstantiated and appointed the Official Receiver to preserve its assets and see that elections are held under its constitution.

    Read the judgment, PDF pages 8–10
  4. Appeal in AFRINIC’s name failed: brought without authority

    The Court of Civil Appeal upheld our objections that the appeal against the receivership, lodged in AFRINIC’s name, was brought without authority, set it aside and restored the receivership order.

    Read 2024 SCJ 473, pages 18–19
  5. Court ordered AFRINIC to enter us in its register of members

    On AFRINIC’s own application, the Supreme Court directed that AFRINIC’s register of members be rectified to add us as a member under section 91 of the Companies Act.

    Read the order of 11 June 2025

Latest statements

All statements